PBHSN Blog

When a Shelter Adopts Out a Dangerous Dog, Everyone Pays

Posted by author-avatar

Recently a couple of stories hit the news that caught my attention for the wrong reasons.

In early January 2026, staff at a Colorado animal shelter were struggling with what to do about a dog in their care. The dog had lunged at other animals, caused a volunteer to fracture her wrist, and was described in internal texts as “wanting to attack every dog who passed by.” City officials were days from euthanizing him.

One shelter technician wrote in an email: “My worry is that an adoption could lead to unfortunate outcomes, such as him returning to us with a history of biting or having issues with other dogs or cats that could result in injury or even death.”

In another text, she put it more bluntly: “It’s like we are waiting for an accident to happen to reason for euthanasia, and that’s not good, because someone or some dog may be injured or even dead.”

Reports indicate that leadership felt pressure, both internal and external, to find a living outcome. A local rescue group pulled the dog from the shelter and placed him in a foster home with two young children. Less than a month later, a police officer responding to a 911 call found the dog with his jaws clamped around the neck of the foster family’s 7-year-old son. Leelan Lokie didn’t survive. The rescue group subsequently relinquished its state license and ceased operations.

What an unbelievable tragedy. A tragedy for the family. A tragedy for the shelter and for animal welfare. A tragedy for the dog.

I’ve spent 15 years in animal welfare leadership, and this is the nightmare scenario that exists in the corner of all of our minds. Every animal in our care represents a decision… and that decision carries consequences far beyond our walls. We’re balancing the welfare of the animals we’ve promised to protect, the safety of the staff and volunteers who show up every day to do this work, and the wellbeing of the families and communities who trust us to make responsible choices. When those considerations pull in different directions (and more often than not they do), there’s no formula that makes the decision easy. There’s only the obligation to make the right one.

The grief of what happens when the system fails, and the knowledge that every decision we make about an animal in our care touches someone else’s life. Someone’s child. A postal worker. Volunteers. And a family who trusts that when they adopt a pet from a shelter, they’re bringing home a companion, not a liability.

A Changing Legal Landscape

In May 2023, a Los Angeles jury awarded $6.8 million to a shelter volunteer who was mauled by a dog with a documented bite history that was never disclosed to her. A few months later, another case resulted in a $7.5 million settlement after a dog with a prior attack record was adopted out to a family without anyone mentioning the dog had previously hospitalized a jogger. In early 2026, yet another verdict came in at $5.4 million. The dog’s kennel notes documented prior attacks on a teenager and a shelter employee, sending both to the hospital. That information never made it to the person hired to transport him.

Over the past several years, Los Angeles Animal Services alone has paid out more than $31 million in settlements and verdicts tied to dogs with undisclosed bite histories. Each case followed the same pattern: the shelter knew about the risk, and someone got hurt.

The legal term is negligence. For all of us, it’s just preventable tragedy.

And the consequences go well beyond any single courtroom. According to the Insurance Information Institute and State Farm, dog bite claims cost insurers $1.86 billion in 2025… an 18.6% increase from the prior year. The number of claims jumped 25% in a single year and has risen 57% over the past decade. California and Florida lead the nation in total claims.

Insurance risk is assessed at the industry level, which means lawsuits against any shelter affect every shelter’s ability to maintain coverage. The California Animal Welfare Association has warned that some insurers have already left the animal welfare market entirely, and that half of California’s shelter animals move through nonprofit organizations whose very ability to operate is now in question. Los Angeles County’s own animal care department has said it plainly: without liability insurance, rescue organizations can be “quickly bankrupted” and will “cease to exist.” It doesn’t help anyone, they wrote. And it doesn’t help any animals.

When a New Jersey rescue called Eleventh Hour Rescue was ordered to pay $1.62 million after a dog they’d placed in a foster home attacked a visitor, the property owner filed for bankruptcy because they had no liability insurance. It’s the highest disclosed payout for a foster-related attack on record. Organizations across the country are losing their longstanding insurance coverage or watching their limits drop from $1 million to $250,000, while the average lawsuit payout continues to climb. One bad outcome can mean the end. Not a setback. The end.

The Pam Rock Act

Here in Florida, a law called the Pam Rock Act took effect in July of last year. It’s named after Pam Rock, a 61-year-old postal carrier who was fatally mauled by five dogs in Putnam County in August 2022. Those dogs had a documented history of aggression.

There’s a natural reaction to tragedies like these, and it’s usually to find someone to blame. The owners didn’t manage their pets. The shelter shouldn’t have adopted the dog out. The breed is the problem. Someone should have known better. I understand the impulse. But I’ve spent enough years in this work to know that blame is almost always backward-looking… it tries to make sense of something that’s already happened. What we actually need is better decision-making before something happens. This industry needs fewer arguments about who was wrong and more systems to make sure fewer things go wrong in the first place.

The Pam Rock Act creates new requirements for how Florida handles dangerous dogs. For shelters, that includes mandatory disclosure if a dog has been classified as dangerous, visible warning signs on kennels housing dogs with documented aggression, and explicit notification to adopters about their legal responsibilities.

For owners of dogs officially classified as “dangerous” by animal control (a classification applied when a dog has aggressively bitten, attacked, or endangered a human, or approached someone in a menacing manner), the requirements are significant: $100,000 minimum liability insurance, secure enclosure, mandatory microchipping (removing the chip is now a felony), and spaying or neutering. The state also created a dangerous dog registry that follows animals across county lines… closing a loophole where owners could previously “reset” a dog’s record by moving.

This isn’t breed-specific legislation. It’s behavior-based. What matters is what a dog has done, not what it looks like. The law incorporates the Dunbar Bite Scale into legal assessments. A dog inflicting a bite at Level 5 or 6 (multiple deep punctures, or fatal/catastrophic injury) must be immediately confiscated.

Florida sees more than 600 hospitalizations from dog bites every year and averages roughly two fatalities annually. Behind those numbers are real people, and real consequences that in many cases could have been prevented with better information and more responsible decisions from the people involved.

What This Means at PBHSN

Every morning at Patty Baker Humane Society Naples, our team undertakes population rounds. Every animal in the building gets a conversation… their behavioral profile, their medical history, what they need, where they are in their care plan. From a new puppy who just hit the adoption floor, to a long stay cat with medical conditions. When we’re working with a dog whose behavior raises safety concerns, we don’t rely on a single observation or a checklist. We have extended conversations. We’ve brought in outside behaviorist consultants for their third-party recommendations. We use documentation and data-driven information based on industry established best practices from organizations like the Association of Shelter Veterinarians and ASPCA to help guide our work.

Sometimes those assessments lead to additional training, a different placement approach, or more time. And sometimes, when we’ve explored every avenue and consulted every expert we can reach, they lead to the hardest conversation in animal welfare.

We don’t take that lightly. We never will.

But an adoption waiver doesn’t protect the neighbor’s child. A disclosure form doesn’t undo a mauling. Placing a dangerous dog into a community doesn’t “save a life”… it transfers risk to someone else’s family. And right now, across this industry, we are watching what happens when organizations don’t have the courage or the framework to make that call.

Responsible decisions aren’t just ethically correct. They’re legally necessary. And they’re what allow us to continue helping the thousands of animals who come through our doors each year… animals who deserve safe, loving homes and communities that can trust the shelters serving them.

That’s the work. And it’s the work we’ll keep doing.

Further Reading & Additional Information

Back to list
Older Failure Is How We Learn to Do Better (Guest Blog)